At the
beginning our careers when we started to work, we were aware of our
shortcomings and weakness, it was not so easy to plan a class, develop
activities that promote all the skills, create tests or control students
discipline and behavior. All those factors make us be aware of the importance
to get more experience and become more tactful, dynamic and patients. We as new
teachers felt the necessity to improve our lessons plans, classroom management
skills, strategies to teach and ways to evaluate. It was not an easy way
because those days we spent more time planning and controlling students’ behavior
and less time teaching students.
Now that we could get a little more experience
we could realized that not only many mistakes were made but also changed as the time went by. One those mistakes I want to make emphasis in this reflection is the
way tests were chosen, created and scored. Creating a test goes beyond than
just implementing the topics taught and explained in class. According to Brown (2006), tests have to be
carefully constructed, edited, tried out, and revised in order to be more
reliable. Taking into account these factors
we can change our perspective and try to apply them in order to get higher
reliability, washback and content validity.
As a
conclusion, we should be careful in the way tests are implemented in our
classrooms, sometimes aspects such as time, purpose, objectives, instructions
and kind of tasks are just forgotten and given less importance. If we don’t apply these key aspects that we
have learned, tests are going to be a matter of worry for our students in terms
of frustration, misunderstandings, anxiety, etc.
Yes,many teachers just give excuses susch as time constrains but they do not realize that this kind of informal criteria and unsystematic process of test designing influences their future practices, I mean, the teacher who gets used to do things on the spot and without any preparation at all, becomes lazy and their judgment will lack reliability.
ResponderEliminar